The recent talcum powder lawsuit verdict in favor of the plaintiff that took place before the City of St. Louis Circuit Court revealed a host of nefarious actions taken by Johnson & Johnson to cover up and conceal their knowledge of the link between talcum powder and ovarian cancer from the public.
The first talcum powder verdict reached before City of St. Louis Circuit Court found that healthcare company Johnson & Johnson (J&J;) had not been truthful in the marketing of the talcum powder products, which hundreds of lawsuits nationwide claim are linked to an increased risk for ovarian cancer. The plaintiff in the trial, represented by The Onder Law Firm, passed away in October from the ovarian cancer that she claimed was caused by J&J;'s talcum powder products. With that claim, her attorneys brought decades of talcum powder medical research to demonstrate that causal link and internal documents unearthed from J&J; that proved the company was aware of their product's connection to ovarian cancer and intentionally chose to keep those records from the public.
The gravity of the deception behind J&J;'s silence regarding talcum powder and ovarian cancer cannot be underestimated, as an epidemiologist who testified during the trial claimed that as many as 10 percent of the roughly 14,000 women that will die this year from ovarian cancer can be connected to talcum powder. J&J; is by far the largest manufacturer of talcum powder, as one in five households in the U.S. use the company's brand of talcum products. The rationale presented by the company legitimizing their decision to not affix warning labels to their products was based on cherry-picked studies that had elicited harsh feedback documented by internal J&J; documents.
Attorneys representing the plaintiff presented these documents at the trial, which included a letter sent to J&J; from a doctor named Alfred P. Wehner that called a 1997 study the company relied on as evidence against a talcum powder ovarian cancer link as a flat out falsehood. Not only did this document prove that J&J; relied on faulty information to avoid warning the public about their talcum powder products, but that the company had long been aware of the dangers and had tried to game the system at the expense of consumer health for decades.
The trial eventually found J&J; guilty of both failing to affix warning labels on their talcum powder products when they had information indicating their necessity, and conspiring to keep their knowledge of a causal link between talcum powder and ovarian cancer from the public. After the trial had concluded, J&J;'s spokesman continued to claim that the company believed it had done nothing wrong and that based on their research talcum powder showed no significant link with ovarian cancer.
J&J;'s stance on the scientific data supporting a link between talcum powder and ovarian cancer no longer holds much sway however after the jury's response to the evidence presented by The Onder Law Firm. The talcum powder cancer lawsuit verdict not only found in favor of the plaintiff, but awarded them $10 in compensatory damages and $62 million in punitive damages. This outcome will go a long way toward securing victories for the more than 1,000 pending talcum powder lawsuit around the country.
Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuit Center is an authority on ovarian cancer lawsuits stemming from adult feminine hygiene use and represents the attorneys who secured the recent $72 million talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuit verdict against Johnson & Johnson.
Article Source: http://www.abcarticledirectory.com
TalcumPowderCancerLawsuitCenter.com is an authority on ovarian cancer lawsuits stemming from adult feminine hygiene use and represents the attorneys who secured the recent $72 million talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuit verdict against Johnson & Johnson.
Still Searching? Last Chance to find what you're looking for with a Google Custom Search!
Or.... You can search this site using our Bing Custom Search!
Did You Like/Dislike This Article? Give It YOUR Rating!
Please Rate this Article
5 out of 54 out of 53 out of 52 out of 51 out of 5
No Ratings Yet. Be The First To Rate This Article
Powered by ABC Article Directory