ABC Article Directory banner displaying blue butterfly logo. Click to go directly to the main Homepage


Eminent Domains






     Copyright (c) 2014 Mark Shapiro

Inverse condemnation (sometimes called eminent domain) is a legal phrase which describes a situation when the government takes private property and does not pay compensation to the property owner as is required by the Fourteenth and Fifth Amendments to the US Constitution.

One of my many judgment articles: I'm a Judgment Broker, not a lawyer, and this article is my opinion based on my experience within California, please consult with a lawyer if you need legal advice.

In certain jurisdictions, inverse condemnation also includes damaging property. In order to get paid, the owner of the property often needs to start a lawsuit our government. With these kind of situations, the property owner will be the plaintiff, and that's the reasons the action is considered to be inverse, because the position of the parties will be reversed. This is in contrast to the more common situation of a direct condemnation, when the government is the plaintiff, that sues an owner in order to take their personal property.

Government seizures can be of a physical nature, (for example, flooding, the taking of land, deprivation of land access, keeping of land after a lease to our government expires, removing access, removal of ground-based support, etc.) or taking because of a regulation (when the laws become so onerous that they make the regulated property unusable by the property owner for any reasonable or economical purposes).

Sometimes inverse condemnation is just too much and becomes a controversy. See Pennsylvania Coal Company versus Mahon, 260 U.S. 393 (1922), where the property owner lost marketability and value, denying them the benefits of property ownership with no payment.

Unfortunately, the US Supreme Court hasn't elaborated on what "too far" means. But, the court has defined three situations where inverse condemnation occurs:

1) Physical occupation or seizures.

2) The reduction of a property's utility or value to the degree that it is no longer capable of being viable.

3) For a precondition to issuing some permit, our government demands that a property owner give their personal property to our government, even when there is no rational reason to do so. See Nollan versus California Coastal Co., 483 U.S. 825 (1987).

Because of the 3 circumstances called "per se" regulatory seizures, the decision whether or not property was taken is created by judicial consideration of 3 factors:

1) The type of government regulations.

2) Any economic effect of the regulations on a owner's property.

3) The extent to which the regulations interfere with the owner's reasonable, investment-backed expectations.

These three factors are known as the "three-factor Penn Central test", (named after Penn Central Transportation Company versus City of New York, 438 US 104, 124 [1978]). The Penn Central decision was criticized because of it's controversial "taking issue" decision, as its 3-factor approach was so unclear that it made the decision almost impossible for lawyers to know prior to filing a lawsuit, what factors would be considered decisive by the court, and the way apply the three factors.

Public utilities such as railroads are granted the power of condemnation (sometimes called eminent domain) by state laws, and they can be liable for inverse damaging or seizing of private property during their activities. This includes taking property (e.g., supplies for our military forces during wartime); intellectual property (e.g., patents, copyrights, etc.); and certain contracts.






Article Source: http://www.abcarticledirectory.com

Mark Shapiro - Judgment Broker - www.JudgmentReferral.com - where Judgments go to get Recovered!


Posted on 2014-09-21, By: *

* Click on the author's name to view their profile and articles!!!


Note: The content of this article solely conveys the opinion of its author.


Animated RSS Symbol for the ABC Article Directory rss category feed ... Get Every New Legal Article Delivered Instantly!



Facebook Comments


" data-width="470" data-num-posts="10">




Cartoon image of a figure holding a magnifying glass looking for articles in the ABC Article Directory

Still Searching? Last Chance to find what you're looking for with a Google Custom Search!



Custom Search

Or.... You can search this site using our Bing Custom Search!

Bing




Did You Like/Dislike This Article? Give It YOUR Rating!

Please Rate this Article

No Ratings Yet. Be The First To Rate This Article





/EDF Publishing. All rights reserved. Script Services by: Sustainable Website Design
Use of our free service is protected by our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service | Contact Us

User published content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License
.
Increase your website traffic with Attracta.com

Valid CSS!


ABOUT SSL CERTIFICATES
Date:


Powered by ABC Article Directory